Category Archives: Insurance News

Catch-all category for developments in the law of insurance.

Not “Quantum of Solace” But “Quantum of Claims”

In McCook v. Subramaniam, Master Ronald Dash considered whether to permit a plaintiff to add as a defendant his own auto insurer, under its underinsured motorist endorsement. The insurer resisted the motion on the basis that the plaintiff had not … Continue reading

Posted in Auto, Insurance News, Uninsured or Underinsured | Comments Off on Not “Quantum of Solace” But “Quantum of Claims”

Income Replacement Benefits Subject to Garnishment

Mr. Justice John Cavarzan has held, in Lease Truck Inc. v. Serbinek, that a creditor of an insured is entitled to garnishment of income replacement benefits. Once it receives notice of the garnishment, the insurer paying the accident benefits is … Continue reading

Posted in Auto, Insurance News | Comments Off on Income Replacement Benefits Subject to Garnishment

Insurer Added as Third Party Under Insurance Act Permitted to Examine Insured for Discovery

Corrigendum: Our reference to the Master’s consideration of an Alberta case, Thompson v. McCallum, erroneously contained the following passage: “The insurer suspected that the insured had, in fact, been the driver.” The sentence should read, “The insurer suspected that the plaintiff … Continue reading

Posted in Insurance News | Comments Off on Insurer Added as Third Party Under Insurance Act Permitted to Examine Insured for Discovery

Owner “Relinquished Dominion and Control” of Car, But Her Consent to Possession by Driver Still Necessary?

In Seegmiller v. Langer, Justice George R. Strathy reviewed the law with respect to when the owner of an automobile will be liable when someone else drives it and is involved in an accident. His reasons contain a useful review … Continue reading

Posted in Auto, Insurance News | Comments Off on Owner “Relinquished Dominion and Control” of Car, But Her Consent to Possession by Driver Still Necessary?

Limitation Period for MVA Pecuniary Claims Follows That of Non-pecuniary Claims, Says Superior Court

Hard on the heels of the Court of Appeal’s decision in Grewal v. Ivany, released last Friday, Mr. Justice Paul Perell has delivered reasons in Ng v. Beline that address one of the issues considered in Grewal: in personal injury … Continue reading

Posted in Discoverability, Limitation Periods, Threshold | Comments Off on Limitation Period for MVA Pecuniary Claims Follows That of Non-pecuniary Claims, Says Superior Court

C.A. Opens Door to Multiple Limitation Periods in MVA Cases

[Addendum: Since this decision was released and our commentary posted, Mr. Justice Paul Perell has released reasons in Ng v. Beline that deal directly with the issue discussed in this post. It appears that neither the Court of Appeal nor … Continue reading

Posted in Discoverability, Limitation Periods, Threshold | Comments Off on C.A. Opens Door to Multiple Limitation Periods in MVA Cases

Subrogation by Landlord’s Insurer Permitted Despite Tenant’s Rent Being Applied to Landlord’s Insurance Premiums

1044589 Ontario Inc. (Nantucket Business Centre) dealt with the frequently-litigated issue of the right of a landlord’s insurer to advance a subrogated claim against a tenant. Here, Madam Justice Ruth E. Mesbur held that the landlord’s insurer was entitled to … Continue reading

Posted in Fire Insurance, Insurance News, Subrogation | Comments Off on Subrogation by Landlord’s Insurer Permitted Despite Tenant’s Rent Being Applied to Landlord’s Insurance Premiums

Judge Says Plaintiff Not Required to Pursue Claim Against Tortfeasor As Condition of Accessing Uninsured Motorist Coverage

[Addendum: This decision was upheld by the Court of Appeal on August 21, 2009.] Ontario auto insurers might be surprised to learn that the Insurance Act and the standard auto policy do not require persons claiming against the uninsured motorist coverage to pursue anyone whose negligence … Continue reading

Posted in Auto, Insurance News, Uninsured or Underinsured | Comments Off on Judge Says Plaintiff Not Required to Pursue Claim Against Tortfeasor As Condition of Accessing Uninsured Motorist Coverage

C.A. Adopts Broad Interpretation of “Subcontractor” in CGL “Your Work” Exclusion

This afternoon, the Court of Appeal released its decision in AXA Insurance v. Ani-Wall Concrete Forming. (We previously commented here on the decision of Perell J. from which the appeal was taken.) The issue in the case was whether Ani-Wall … Continue reading

Posted in CGL, Exclusions, Insurance News | Comments Off on C.A. Adopts Broad Interpretation of “Subcontractor” in CGL “Your Work” Exclusion

First Bill 198 Decision Says Not Much Has Changed

Nissan v. McNamee is, so far as we know, the first decision to interpret the “gloss” on the Insurance Act threshold that was enacted by regulation O.Reg. 381/03 (the package of legislative changes commonly referred to as “Bill 198”). The regulation took effect on … Continue reading

Posted in Auto, Insurance News, Threshold | Comments Off on First Bill 198 Decision Says Not Much Has Changed