-
Recent Posts
Archives
- October 2015
- July 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- May 2014
- January 2014
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- September 2011
- May 2011
- February 2011
- October 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
Categories
- Advertising Injury
- Allocation of Defence Costs
- Appeals
- Auto
- Auto (Tort)
- CGL
- Collateral Benefits
- Commercial Litigation
- Conflict of Laws
- Contract
- Costs
- Damages
- Defamation
- Discoverability
- Discovery
- Duty to Defend
- Environmental
- Evidence
- Exclusions
- Experts and Opinions
- Fire Insurance
- Fires
- FLA
- Insurance News
- Juries
- Lawyers
- Limitation Periods
- Litigation Technology
- Municipalities
- Occupier's Liability
- Pleadings
- Practice and Procedure
- Practice of Law
- Privacy
- Privilege
- Products Liability
- Professional Liability
- Risk Transfer
- Sale of Goods
- Social and Commercial Host Liability
- Subrogation
- Threshold
- Tort News
- Trial Procedure
- Uncategorized
- Uninsured or Underinsured
- Waivers and releases
Meta
Monthly Archives: November 2004
Assessing MVA Damages in 2005
There will soon be some significant changes to the way that BI damages are assessed in MVA cases. In this edition of our Update, we will try to assist you in applying these new principles.
Posted in Auto, Damages, Insurance News
Comments Off on Assessing MVA Damages in 2005
When is a Car not a Car?
The case of Meadowview Heights Ltd. v. Revivo raises some issues reminiscent of our undergraduate philosophy course in “Personal Identity”. But on a more prosaic level, the case is a useful interpreation of the exclusion, found in both homeowner’s and … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Fire Insurance, Insurance News
Comments Off on When is a Car not a Car?
Underwriting File Ordered Produced
Royal & SunAlliance v. Lombard and Allianz is a Divisional Court decision from last month that slipped by us. It’s of some interest, so better late than never… RSA is suing Allianz for reimbursement for the amount paid to settle … Continue reading
Posted in Discovery, Practice and Procedure
Comments Off on Underwriting File Ordered Produced
No Liability for Fire
Nothing earth-shattering about Goodliff v. Woodcock, but it is the latest case to deal with “accidental fires”. Usually, it’s the landlord’s insurer suing the tenant (and running into the body of caselaw where implied waivers of subrogation have frequently been … Continue reading
Detailed Analysis of “Catastrophic Impairment”
In Desbiens v. Mordini, Mr. Justice Harvey Spiegel has written a very lengthy, comprehensive set of reasons in a personal injury case in which one of the key issues was the interpretation of “catastrophic impairment” in Regulation 461/96 of the … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Insurance News
Comments Off on Detailed Analysis of “Catastrophic Impairment”
Corrigendum on Branco Case
We have learned that yesterday’s Update on Branco v. Allianz erroneously referred to Allianz as the defendant. In fact, we now understand that Allianz was the AB carrier and although it had been a defendant originally, it was out of … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Insurance News
Comments Off on Corrigendum on Branco Case
Plaintiffs Get Damages of $750, Costs of $21,000
This case, released today, is a bit of a head-scratcher.In Branco v. Allianz Insurance, the plaintiffs were claiming damages as a result of personal injuries suffered in a motor vehicle accident. The trial lasted eight days before Justice Siegel and … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Costs, Damages, Insurance News, Threshold
Comments Off on Plaintiffs Get Damages of $750, Costs of $21,000
Important Costs Decision
The Court of Appeal today released its decision in Moon v. Sher , which can be viewed at: http://www.ontariocourts.on.ca/decisions/2004/november/C40322.htm We had been anticipating the release of this case, having learned a few weeks ago that Justice Borins of the Court … Continue reading
Posted in Costs
Comments Off on Important Costs Decision
Investigator’s Contact with Plaintiff Fatally Taints Evidence
In Cowles v. Balac, released November 4, 2004, Justice MacFarland of the Ontario Court deals with a problem that we have encountered from time to time: an investigator making direct contact with a plaintiff who is represented by counsel. The … Continue reading
Posted in Evidence
Comments Off on Investigator’s Contact with Plaintiff Fatally Taints Evidence
Latest “Duty to Defend” Case
In A.R.G. Construction Corp. v. Allstate Insurance Co., Mr. Justice Ferrier of the Ontario Superior Court has provided an up-to-date review of the law pertaining to duty to defend, particularly in the context of a CGL policy. The decision can … Continue reading
Posted in Duty to Defend, Insurance News
Comments Off on Latest “Duty to Defend” Case