Monthly Archives: September 2007

Another Ruling Assumes Continued Existence of “Special Circumstances”

In Guay v. BHD Financial Group, Master R. Dash considered whether a limitation period could be extended on account of “special circumstances”. On the facts of the case, the motion to extend the limitation period was dismissed. But the Master … Continue reading

Posted in Discoverability, Limitation Periods | Comments Off on Another Ruling Assumes Continued Existence of “Special Circumstances”

Duty to Defend Held to Exist, Despite “Anti-Concurrent Causation” Clause in Policy

Decision of Justice Kershman dated Aug 10, 2007.pdf  Our office acted for the insured in what is, so far as we can determine, the first decision to consider whether a duty to defend was owed by an insurer whose policy … Continue reading

Posted in CGL, Exclusions, Insurance News | Comments Off on Duty to Defend Held to Exist, Despite “Anti-Concurrent Causation” Clause in Policy

Insurer Hit with $500,000 Punitive Damages Award in Fire Case

It was a good day for Barry Percival, who had cast aside the defence hat that he usually wears and was acting for the plaintiff. In Sagl v. Cosburn, Griffiths & Brandham et al., an action by a policyholder against … Continue reading

Posted in Fire Insurance, Insurance News | Comments Off on Insurer Hit with $500,000 Punitive Damages Award in Fire Case

Trustee Act Limitation Period Bars FLA Claim

In Kramarz v. KMS Cardiology & Diagnostic Centres, Mr. Justice Thomas R. Lederer held that a negligence action against a cardiologist was brought out of time. The suit had been commenced under the Family Law Act by members of the … Continue reading

Posted in Limitation Periods | Comments Off on Trustee Act Limitation Period Bars FLA Claim